The Morning Showseason 3 is finally here.
And you couldn’t get a timelier subject: Thebehind-the-scenes battles to shore up a foundering network, UBA, and squeeze every last drop of value out of its cash-cow morning program.
But the series has never seemed as cutting-edge or smart as it ought to. Say you pried open an iPhone and found that the guts consisted of springs, screws and tiny ticking discs. That’sThe Morning Show.
If that hasn’t really changed with season 3 — everything ultimately swings into place with a tidy improbability — this is nonetheless the series’ best go-round yet.
For one thing, the show has disposed ofSteve Carell’s problematic Mitch (and that exasperating Italian woman!) and brought inJon Hamm, sleek as a seal, as an Elon Musk-like tycoon, Paul Marks, who wouldn’t mind adding UBA to his tool box.
Hamm underplays seductively — when doesn’t he? — as the plot digs into the juicy topic of whether new tech can or should rescue “legacy” media. The endless maneuverings and counter-maneuverings to clinch the deal or scuttle it are entertaining, engrossing and brisk.
They also give Crudup’s Cory Ellison and Lee’s Stella Bak, as UBS’ toughest tactical minds, ample opportunity to steal scenes. Like mice, they find entryways everywhere.
Marks is initially skeptical of the corporate value of Aniston’s superstar anchor, Alex Levy — “What is this Alex Levy magic?” he asks — but he soon feels differently. (Imagine if Musk had rebranded Twitter “XO.”)
Aniston’s performance remains casually glamorous, occasionally sinewy and from time to time biting, although she also pouts adorably, as if she were one of directorGreta Gerwig’s Barbies struggling to overcome a pesky patch of cognitive dissonance. And that’s fine — this is Alex Levi, notLydia Tár.
The one performer who’s at a disadvantage this season is the fiercely committed Witherspoon as Bradley Jackson. In a flashback episode that places Bradley in Washington, D.C. on Jan. 6, 2020 — inside the Capitol Building itself — she makes a disastrous, spur-of-the-moment decision that could end up destroying her career.
Unfortunately, this ripped-from-the-headlines scenario, dramatizing a crucial moment when the tectonic plates of American politics and culture crunched against each other, is a lot less interesting than the question of whether Hamm and Aniston are going to cook at home or order in.
This tends to be a problem withThe Morning Show.Its attempts to grapple with actual current events are commendable, and maybe even essential and unavoidable, but seldom satisfactory: Current events (at least the ones America is going through these days) really do require grappling — cut and thrust, argument, friction — but there’s no real debate going on onThe Morning Show, just perceived media wisdom grafted onto a plot.
The season will also cover the leak of the Supreme Court papers that became the landmark 2022 decisionDobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization,yet here, too, you may still be more interested in whether Hamm and Aniston are going to cook at home or just order in.
Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE’s free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
source: people.com
