When you buy through links on our web site , we may earn an affiliate military commission . Here ’s how it works .
A crash that killed a number one wood in a Tesla Model S electric car in self - beat back mode has shout into query the safety of driverless fomite technology . This week , federal official announced the launching of a formal investigation into the accident .
The crash occurred on May 7 in Williston , Florida , when a tractor - trailer made a odd turn in front of the Tesla , and the motorcar failed to apply the brake , theNew York Times account . It is the first known fatal accident involving a self - driving fomite .
An accident killed the driver of a Tesla Model S electric car in self-driving mode.
In astatement from Teslathat was post on the company ’s blog Thursday ( June 30 ) , the automaker noted that the fatality was the first " in just over 130 million miles where Autopilot was activated . " [ photo : The Robotic Evolution of Self - Driving Cars ]
" It is important to observe that Tesla disables Autopilot by default and requires expressed acknowledgment that the organisation is new technology and still in a public genus Beta form before it can be enabled , " Tesla official wrote .
The Model S is not aself - force car , but Tesla ’s Autopilot feature article is an assistive technology and a first stone’s throw in make for rightfully driverless cars to market . By means of estimator software , sensing element , cameras and radar , the car ’s Autopilot feature can nail task like mix onto a highway , the Atlantic report . Drivers are instructed to keep their hands on the cycle while in Autopilot mode .
Tesla did not specify in their statement how engage the number one wood was at the time of the crash , but did note that : " Neither robot pilot nor the driver noticed the white side of the tractor - laggard against a brightly dismount sky , so the brake was not applied . "
Other companies , like General Motors and Google , have invested in the exploitation of driverless car applied science . In February one of Google ’s ego - driving carscrashed into a omnibus , though there were no reported injuries .
Astests on sovereign vehiclescontinue , the question is whether the engineering science has advance to the item that the government would approve cars that can drive themselves .
In fact , a study published in October 2015 found that self - driving machine are more likely to be in an accident . The subject area , deport by the University of Michigan ’s Transportation Research Institute , found that per million miles travel , self - driving cars had a eminent crash rate than traditional cars . At the time of the study , no self - driving cars had been found at fault for the crashes they were ask in .
There ’s also a moral quandary at play , as a driverless vehicle may have to decide which dwell to save in the consequence of a serious accident . A recent study published in the journal Science found that people O.K. of independent vehicles ( AV ) governed by useful moral philosophy — minimizing the total number of deaths in a crash , even if citizenry in the vehicle were harmed . However , most respondents would not require to ride in those vehicle themselves , Live Science reported .
" The moral quandary for AV is something that is trade name - young , " said study co - source Jean - François Bonnefon , a research director at the Toulouse School of Economics in France . " We ’re verbalize about possess an objective , which you interact with every day , knowing that this object might settle to kill you in certain spot . "
Original article onLive Science .
